The evidence by which the resurrection of
Christ is proved is the testimony of the apostles. This testimony was
originally given orally and later put into writing by the apostles. This
testimony asserts not only the miracle of the resurrection (1 Cor.
15:20), but also the miracle of inspiration. (1 Cor. 2:12, 13)
In spite of this well known fact that the testimony affirms both of
these miracles, it has been asserted that if the resurrection of Christ
"can be proved, it would be no firm basis for verbal inspiration and the
infallibility of the scriptures". In this article it will be shown that
the proof of the resurrection of Christ is a firm basis for the verbal
inspiration and the infallibility of the apostles' testimony.
If the evidence possesses the sufficiency to
prove the resurrection of Christ, that same sufficiency prevails with
reference to the claim of inspiration. In each instance the integrity of
the witnesses plays the vital role. When it is shown that the integrity
of the witnesses cannot be doubted in the one instance, there is, to say
the least, a strong presumption that the same integrity exists in the
other instance. To see the force of this point, just think of the effect
that would be produced upon the mind if it could be proved that the
witnesses were dishonest in their testimony to the resurrection of
Christ. Would anyone contend that this is no firm basis for rejecting
their claim of inspiration? Skeptics are unwilling to allow that the
integrity of the witnesses with reference to other superhuman events
gives firm basis to their claim to inspiration. Such an attitude reveals
a woeful lack of intelligence. Consistency in such an attitude would
require as much confidence in the testimony or a notorious liar as in
the testimony of a man whose honesty was well established.
Ways By Which
Inspiration May Be Proved
There are several routes by which one may
travel to come to the conviction that the witnesses were inspired, that
their claim to be inspired is true. The superhuman restraint seen in the
writings of the witnesses could be studied with great profit. Such a
study in which the style of human genius is contrasted to the style of
divine inspiration will make a very positive contribution to conviction
of the inspiration of the scripture. Another line of study is to note
the boldness with which details are given with reference to local
customs, political arrangements, names and actions of public figures,
etc. All of which could be checked, and if proved false, would discredit
the witnesses. The course of one who sets out to deliberately deceive is
to avoid particulars and deal only in generalities. One could also
collect and examine the evidence of the integrity of the witnesses in
cases where their testimony is the evidence in proof of a superhuman
even. Their integrity being established in these instances, all their
claims must be regarded as the claims of honest men. These and other
courses could be followed, but in this article we shall confine our
efforts to the last named course. The integrity of the witnesses, in
connection with their testimony to the fact of the resurrection Christ,
will be proved. This proved, the question of veracity enter the picture
to create doubt.
The possibility of an apostle being honest
but mistaken can have very little weight when considered in connection
with his claim of such a large number of living eye-witnesses. He could
not have been "honestly mistaken" about this fact. Furthermore, the
improbability of this large number of eye-witnesses being "honestly
mistaken" about the fact of the resurrection of Christ, is so great that
it could be properly called an impossibility. This brief notice on this
point will have to suffice for this time.
This study will be confined to the testimony
of 1 Cor. 15.
Some Facts In 1 Cor.
15
I. The fact that Christ "hath been raised
from the dead" (1 Cor. 15:4) is the bold affirmation of this
testimony.
II. Witnesses to this fact are cited and in
some cases identified by name - "He appeared to Cephas; then to the
twelve; then he appeared to above five hundred brethren at once, of whom
the greater remain until now, but some are fallen asleep; then he
appeared to James; then to all the apostles; and last of all, as to a
child untimely born he appeared to me also." (1 Cor. 15: 5-8)
III. All the witnesses preached the
resurrection of Christ — "Whether then it be I or they, so we preach,
and so ye believed," (1 Cor. 15:11)
IV. The apostle frankly states that if
Christ hath not been raised — "we are found false witnesses of God."
(1 Cor. 15: 15)
V. The apostle makes an argument for his
integrity based upon his actions in relation to the resurrection of
Christ — "Why do we also stand in jeopardy every hour? I protest by that
glorying in you, brethren, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die
daily. If after the manner of men I fought with beasts at Ephesus what
doth it profit me? If the dead are not raised, let us eat and drink, for
tomorrow we die". (1 Cor. 15:30-32)
Some Observations On
These Facts
The integrity of this witness is seen in his
claim of a large number of witnesses to the fact and the possibility of
these witnesses being consulted as most of them were still alive
according to the apostle's testimony. The truthfulness or falseness of
this could be readily established by those of Paul's day. To contend
that the people of Corinth Athens and other centers of culture and
learning of that day were too dull or lacking in interest to check up on
this claim and expose the apostle as dishonest, thus disproving the fact
which he affirmed, is to reflect most unfavorably upon the intelligence
of the successors of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. It seems that
modern skeptics are lacking in respect not only for the intelligence of
those who believe the Bible, but that this lack of respect extends to
their own kind as well.
This claim of a large number of living
eye-witnesses to the fact is evidence that the document containing the
claim was written soon enough after the event, to come within an average
life span. If this were not the case, then the evidence of its falseness
is on the surface. This evidence lends weight to the generally accepted
date of the writing of 1 Corinthians as 56 or 57 A. D. Considering the
later date in relation to the date of Christ's death A. D. 33, we see
that twenty-four years had elapsed since he resurrection of Christ, the
fact about which the testimony is concerned. The testimony being put
into writing in such close proximity of time to the alleged fact is
strong evidence in proof of the truthfulness of the testimony. Not
enough time had elapsed to make it difficult to establish the character
of the witnesses.
The dangers to which the giving of this
testimony exposed the witnesses are proof of the integrity of the
witnesses. If they were not fully convinced of the truth of what they
testified, they could never have sacrificed their material interest and
jeopardized their very lives as they did. "If Christ hath not been
raised", what worthy explanation can be given for the actions of the
witnesses? Paul makes this very argument in proof of the fact of the
resurrection. "Why do we also stand in jeopardy every hour? I protest by
that glorying in you brethren, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I
die daily. If after the manner of men I fought with beasts at Ephesus,
what doth it profit me? If the dead are not raised, let us eat and
drink, for tomorrow we die." (1 Cor. 15:30-32) Let the skeptic
grapple with Paul's argument: Here he presents the two courses open to
him. He could pursue the course of fleshly gratification and that is the
course that anyone will pursue who does not believe that "Christ hath
been raised from the dead," or he could follow the course of suffering
sacrifice and finally death. His following the latter course proved his
depth of conviction that Christ hath been raised from the dead.
These considerations establish the integrity
of the witnesses in this instance. Anyone who would question the honesty
of a witness in these circumstances must surely have rendered himself
incapable of conviction by closing his eyes and stopping his ears and
hardening his heart. If the integrity of the witness be granted in this
instance, upon what basis can it be withheld in the other instances? If
the apostle is honest in his claim that Christ hath been raised, why
should it be thought that he is dishonest in his claim of inspiration?
The proof of the resurrection of Christ is a
firm basis for the verbal inspiration and the infallibility of the
scriptures.
Gospel Guardian – April 14, 1960
Other Articles
Questions to Ask When We Complain
Jesus Emptied Himself a Basic Approach
"As Long as It Does not Harm Anyone"
Pathetic Dust or a Living Hope
You May be Surprised to Learn
Moralizing Over the Gospel
Alcohol and Wisdom
Brotherly Love
The Logic of Authority
Was Jesus Literally
Forsaken?
Baptism and the Blood
The Problem With Creeds
- Caffin,
B.C. (1950), II Peter – Pulpit Commentary, H.D.M. Spence
and Joseph Exell, eds. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
For Past Auburn Beacons go to:
www.aubeacon.com/Bulletins.htm |
Anyone can join the mailing list for the Auburn Beacon! Send
your request to:
larryrouse@aubeacon.com |